Posts Tagged ‘politics’

I wrote the article below several years ago when the debt ceiling debate was all the rage in Washington. D. C. Then I got to thinking about technology-the net, smart phones, social media etc so recently added a bit of information at the end beyond the issue of the debt ceiling. At a later date I may revisit this issue and focus less on the debt ceiling and expand but view this as a starting point. I truly believe we are suffering from information overload and it is troubling to me on many levels.


Pundits recently offered varying opinions about whom they thought benefited from the debt ceiling debate and debacle and came up with diverse responses including the Democrats, Republicans-Tea Partiers, Lobbyists, Wall Street fat cats, and even gasp, the people.

I’m not quite certain yet exactly who won the debate but I think social media, transparency and public participation definitely emerged as winners. That’s great news for the democratic process. But, are we better off because of it?

Transparency, social media and public participation won and while certainly welcome and refreshing will likely vex the lawmaking, deal making process forever by compromising it-intruding if you will, in a process long conducted somewhat behind closed doors and off the radar screen of many.

The lobbying process has been around for a long time but most of the work has been conducted behind the scenes as elected officials responded to various opinions, interests and political pressures to work the kinks out of an issue or legislation for better or worse depending on your perspective.

We all know there are countless “lobbyists” and recognize that the process that takes place will eventually end up benefiting some at the expense of the rest.  Lobbying isn’t a bad word and just about anyone can “lobby” on a given issue that they are passionate about and believe in it’s simply a very competitive, often frustrating, lengthy process.

Regardless, most of the time the process of lobbying is a long, complex one that involves passion, research, compromise, horse-trading, face-saving, reputation enhancing or whatever it takes to get the job done. A process that like it or not is by its very nature prone to being influenced by money, power, perceptions among other things.

Typically, public involvement has been in the form of meetings, phone calls to talk shows, letter writing, emailing, group visits to Congress, state level legislators, municipal officials. This was/is an often very slow vetting process prone to abuse, delays, unpredictable issues, ideological differences, complications, “politics” or even the whims of an elected officials’ staff as to whom to schedule and when.

Now, thanks to the growing influence and use of social media and the mandates for greater  transparency everyone- The Prez, Congressmen, the media, inmates, illegal immigrants, kids, housewives, students, foreigners,  terrorists, whack jobs, indeed everyone and anyone may be potentially be openly involved in the day to day process.

We’re constantly face booking, tweeting things about the process, legislation, who said what to whom every second. This hands on citizen process and involvement truncates the lawmaking, vetting, deal making, compromising process. While this is a great step towards a truly democratic, open process the potential for slowing it down and clogging up the system is great.

At the same time our form of government was created to allow us to elect others, to represent us in DC, at the State House in City Hall so we can go about the business of living our lives.

Today, the process of governing is becoming so transparent and immediate and in our faces that some of our leaders are afraid to take action, make decisions without being quoted, tweeted, castigated, and praised and it is making the lawmaking process even slower than the norm.

The increased transparency, social media and citizen involvement are positive of course because it puts our leaders on notice and in theory the “people” may/should benefit by knowing what is going on and who benefits from legislation. I fear the process may grind to a halt as individuals get more involved in the day to day details of legislating and politics and horse trading we know little about.

For instance, before the emergence of the debt ceiling crisis how many of us knew or even cared what it is, what is involved, and so on.  After all many of us are too busy looking for jobs, housing, affordable health care, food stamps to focus. Otto von Bismarck supposedly said we should never see sausages or laws being made and perhaps he was right on the money with that sentiment.

Can you imagine what the 55 members of the Constitutional Convention who gathered to sign off on our Constitution might have said, written, agreed upon if the public-the world had been involved? Back then 55 men signed off on the Constitution but the debt ceiling issue may have involved as many as 55 million trying to influence it, who knows? Do we really need to be involved in every decision that happens in Washington D.C, state and local government or do we have other things that we should be more concerned about?

In the 1770s’ news, political changes, presumably everything took forever to travel from the East to the West Coast and who knows how long to reach say Asia so there were far less implications, reactions good, bad or indifferent. Even back in my early days news reports about early space travel, election results, casualties in Viet Nam, and natural disasters a world away were transmitted to us if at all through grainy B & W TVs or transistor radios.

Communications tools and technology including computers, smart phones, the internet and social media among others have brought us closer together and helped us to stay in touch and make positive contributions to society. For instance we can now stay in touch with long lost family and friends even though we may never see them in person preferring instead to communicate from our homes, offices or even bathrooms.

Last year’s ALS Ice Bucket Challenge which found people from around the world dousing themselves with ice and challenging one another to do the same raked in millions to help battle the devastating ALS disease. In another instance a woman in desperate need of a bone marrow match for a family member used social media to find one presumably saving her spouse from death.

However, along with the good that technology has brought I believe we are inadvertently (and I daresay at times intentionally) stressing one another out, angrily taunting and insulting one another from afar because the net and social media have enabled us to do so seemingly without retribution. If someone posts a story or picture about anything good or bad, there is going to be a guaranteed response regardless and sometimes it is nasty, biased or include language and imagery that should never be shared.

This does not even take into consideration the fact that terrorists, serial killers, animal and child abusers, ISIS whack jobs, crazed world leaders and others can establish facebook and twitter accounts. These individuals can then gain privileged information about trade secrets, security measures, develop bombs and easily assimilate with others thanks to information available and earn their 15 minutes of fame or infamy- AND WE ARE ALL HELPING THEM TO DO SO AND PERPETUATE THEIR MADNESS.

We have become a world of individuals who are too dependent and obsessed with information that may or may not have any bearing on our day to day lives and while it may be useful, informative and life enhancing it is making us crazy. There is much more that can be said about this issue and I am hopeful that I have sparked debate and caused you to think a bit more about it.


Read Full Post »

I wrote this article five years ago and have not edited it in some time. As much as the internet, social media and related technologies have been a boon to civilization I also believe it is having an increasingly negative impact. Now we can no longer live our lives in ignorance since we are constantly deluged with info we have little control over. Information is great if we take action but if we just post about it and simply spread the message what are we really accomplishing?


Why do employers fear social media and ban or limit their employees from using it during work hours? Do employers have a valid concern about social media use by employees and do they have the right to limit or ban its use? Will Executives over 50 ever get Social Media and why do many resist embracing and promoting it?

I’ve seen these and similar queries posed as more and more news stories break about employees using or abusing social media outlets while ostensibly working. Granted there is a valid place for social media and a need for it to enhance an organization’s communications abilities or reach. However, I believe employee use must be monitored during work hours and guidelines implemented concerning what is communicated by whom and when, where and why.

Common sense and respect for the rights of others should prevail when it comes to the use of social media but in reality some individuals simply lack such traits. Employees must be educated about what types of information should be transmitted regardless of whether it is during work hours or after hours when it relates to their employer.

For instance, should a hospital employee be able to post patient information or photos on Facebook? Should an employee working in corrections display pictures of an inmate’s cell online? Is it reasonable for an employee of a company providing supplies to the US Department of Defense to discuss contracts or display pictures of prototypes?

I appreciate social media and embrace all it has to offer but also believe it is simply one more tool (albeit a powerful one) to be used to communicate effectively along with the more time tested, traditional methods. As such, I wanted to offer my own humble opinion about why there may be reluctance on the part of some to accept social media and all it has to offer if used judiciously.

Many executives or individuals in their 40’s, 50’s, and 60’s are used to working in an environment that is very private, personal and reserved. Those who are even older remember wartime slogans such as “Loose lips, sink ships” and are concerned about indiscretion out of concerns about privacy, confidentiality breaches, reputations, decorum, trust, lawsuits and so much more.

In this era of increased reliance on new technologies, ever changing communications channels and greater transparency the ability to develop and maintain trust is perhaps more important than ever before as we struggle to keep things in check.

At this point corporations, government agencies and individuals should be gravely concerned with how much information should be shared online and otherwise and with whom. As a business owner do you really want to do business with an organization or agency whose employees openly discuss your business, contracts, staff, and profits online?

The ability of workers engaged in confidential work activities to note their every movement (via Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin et al) and post pictures of their work site or seemingly private after hours proclivities is terrifying to many business owners since it can cause their clients to lose faith and trust in them among other things. So while it is important to develop ones online brand and identity to effectively compete it is similarly necessary to preserve trust above all else.

When I first got involved in Boston politics and organizing political campaigns I remember the older activists suggesting that one should abide by a “Code of Silence” such as that attributed to Marty Lomasney, Ward boss of Boston’s Ward 8 regarding the need for discretion.

Lomasney, who served Boston as a state Senator, Representative and Alderman may best be remembered for allegedly saying that when it comes to discretion “Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod if you can wink.” Today, that quote could probably be updated by adding “never put it in e-mail, text it or post it to Twitter, Yahoo, Facebook, Linkedin” and on and on and on.”

The advent of things such as the internet and cell phones while incredibly useful have enabled people to easily share information about themselves and conversely learn more about the other person. In many cases this has led to privacy invasion, identity theft, embarrassment because of past/current transgressions that suddenly become fodder for gossip etc. Then of course misuse can also lead to other events such as claims of libel, slander and potential lawsuits.

I think perhaps many erroneously believe that branding and creating or preserving one’s reputation somehow just materialized over the past few years due to the internet and social media.

Senior executives are used to doing business privately and maintaining a reputation as being staid and creating a brand that buyers and the creators themselves could be proud of and believe in. Think IBM, Sears, Ford or any of the millions of iconic businesses that have been around forever or finally merged or collapsed after many, many years of successful operation.

Of course then there are issues of competition and concealing company secrets from competitors out of a desire to be successful and make a profit and maintain patents from infringement and theft.

Think of corporate or government communications for instance. Generally there has been one department, team or individual responsible for publicity, marketing, or otherwise spreading good news and minimizing the bad. Requests for information have generally been channeled via the department, team, and individual so everyone is on the same page.

If a crisis or incident happens in a government agency or say a hospital historically there has been a crisis communications plan with one, unified voice to protect the interests of the institution and those involved. To many executives social media is viewed as being unrestrained and loose since conceivably everyone within the organization can “discuss” every minute detail of a crisis to the “world” instantaneously.

Today in our age of sound bites and immediacy-information sharing that is unfiltered, too personal or overly transparent can be cause for concern to many older and younger individuals alike.

This includes revealing every private moment about ones life, love life, sexual escapades, what they had for breakfast, how much alcohol they had to drink the night before or any other event that people like to talk about seemingly without reservation. It seems like only yesterday people would say “that’s way more information than I need to know” if you provided them with too many intimate details about your life.

Its one thing for individuals to tweet about themselves, reveal secrets about their lives and loves on Facebook, Linkedin or any other venue but quite another thing to share such items or confidential corporate information especially while ostensibly working.

To many executives such activities while useful in extolling the virtues of an organization can be viewed as potentially damaging to one’s brand and time consuming and wasteful. This is especially worrisome to executives if it is done haphazardly, consistently, illegally or in a manner that causes libel, slander of injury to another.

It’s incredible how much information some are willing to share with the world. Some individuals cherish their privacy and have a greater sense of privacy, decorum and tastefulness than others who seemingly seek to tell the world about every event in their lives. Think sexting and sharing pictures of oneself nude, drunk or engaged in what should be private pursuits via a cell phone, net, Instagram and on and on.

I’ve personally come a long way concerning what I’m willing to share. Social media obviously offers tremendous benefits but many believe it should be prudently used in the work environment since so much is potentially at stake. I agree.

Read Full Post »